How Border Emergencies Shape National Security and Influence Criminal Networks

President Trump declares a national emergency at the southern border, designating criminal networks as terrorist organizations to combat illegal immigration and drug trafficking.

Quick Takes

National emergency declaration aims to enhance border security and combat transnational criminal organizations
Tren de Aragua and MS-13 to be designated as Foreign Terrorist Organizations (FTOs)
Military personnel and resources to be deployed to support border control efforts
New authorities unlocked for dealing with migrants and criminal organizations
Experts warn of potential complications, including strained international relations

Trump Administration Takes Decisive Action on Border Security

In a bold move to address what he describes as an “invasion” at the southern border, President Donald Trump has declared a national emergency and vowed to designate certain drug cartels and gangs as foreign terrorist organizations (FTOs). This decision comes as part of a comprehensive strategy to combat illegal immigration, drug trafficking, and associated criminal activities that have plagued the United States-Mexico border.

The declaration, which invokes sections of the National Emergencies Act and U.S. Code, authorizes the deployment of military personnel and resources to support border control efforts. The move is intended to provide additional tools and resources to law enforcement agencies tasked with securing the border and combating transnational criminal organizations.

J/20th, 2021: Biden terminates the U.S. national border emergency declaration

J/20th, 2025: Trump signs a new one pic.twitter.com/nugk8DgxeX

— End Wokeness (@EndWokeness) January 21, 2025

Expanded Powers and New Designations

Under the new measures, the Venezuela-based gang Tren de Aragua and El Salvador-based MS-13 are set to be named as Foreign Terrorist Organizations. This designation allows the Justice Department to pursue individuals suspected of providing “material support” to these groups, significantly expanding the scope of law enforcement operations.

The declaration also enables the use of military intelligence and capabilities for deeper surveillance of these groups, potentially enhancing the government’s ability to disrupt their operations. A new homeland security task force will be established to carry out related orders and actions within the United States, while the Secretary of Defense will determine the shape and scope of any military action.

Potential Impacts and Concerns

While proponents argue that these measures will significantly improve national security, some experts caution against potential drawbacks. Critics warn that such designations could lead to more brutal tactics by cartels and strain international relations, particularly with neighboring countries.

Additionally, concerns have been raised about the impact on military readiness and training. With approximately 2,500 troops currently serving at the southern border under a previous authorization, some argue that further deployments could detract from other critical military missions and preparedness.

A Call to Action

President Trump has framed this decision as a necessary response to protect American sovereignty and public safety. In the official proclamation, he states, “America’s sovereignty is under attack,” and emphasizes, “As Commander in Chief, I have no more solemn duty than to protect the American people.”

The declaration outlines several key actions, including the construction of additional physical barriers along the southern border, consideration of waivers to counter unmanned aerial systems near the border, and revision of policies and strategies to prioritize border security and safety of personnel. The Secretaries of Defense and Homeland Security are required to provide regular updates to the President on actions taken and border conditions.

As this new approach to border security unfolds, its effectiveness and implications will be closely watched by policymakers, law enforcement agencies, and the American public alike. The coming months will likely reveal whether this strategy can successfully address the complex challenges at the southern border without incurring unintended consequences.