The New York Times has launched a scathing attack on Sean and Rachel Campos-Duffy’s Catholic family values, mocking everything from their traditional gender roles to their minivan in what critics are calling a blatant hit piece against conservative family life.
Key Takeaways
- Caroline Kitchener, a “family journalist” with a history of abortion coverage, wrote what many consider a hit piece against the Duffy family’s traditional Catholic lifestyle
- The article mockingly criticizes the Duffys’ embrace of traditional gender roles, their opposition to abortion, and even their use of a family minivan
- Sean Duffy’s public commitment to his marriage and family is portrayed with suspicion and derision despite studies supporting benefits of traditional family structures
- The piece has sparked significant backlash from conservative commentators who view it as evidence of media bias against religious and traditional family values
Media Bias Against Traditional Family Values
In what can only be described as a thinly veiled ideological attack, New York Times journalist Caroline Kitchener has published a critical examination of Sean and Rachel Campos-Duffy’s traditional Catholic family life. The article, appearing in the June 2025 edition of the Times, takes aim at virtually every aspect of the Duffys’ lifestyle choices, from their division of household responsibilities to their choice of family vehicle, portraying their adherence to traditional values as somehow suspect or worthy of ridicule in modern society.
The tone of the piece is established immediately with Kitchener’s opening line: “Sean Duffy would like you to watch his family making pancakes.” From there, the article descends into a systematic critique of the family’s traditional gender roles, writing with apparent disapproval that “In this all-American household, the roles were clear: Mom whisks and Dad mans the griddle.” This framing suggests there’s something problematic about a family choosing traditional role divisions in their household, revealing the writer’s evident bias against conservative family structures.
“A New York Times article authored by a “family journalist” and former Washington Post correspondent who covered abortion opens with the line: “Sean Duffy would like you to watch his family making pancakes.””,said Caroline Kitchener .
Mocking Traditional Masculinity and Marriage
Particularly troubling is Kitchener’s portrayal of Sean Duffy’s commitment to his family and marriage. Rather than presenting his dedication as admirable, the article frames his devotion with a skeptical and almost mocking tone. Kitchener describes him as “A red-blooded American male who once scored with reality TV stars, he is now a devoted dad with his own chicken coop and beehives, publicly pledging his commitment to his wife and their old Chrysler minivan.” The phrasing clearly implies there’s something suspicious about a man being faithful to his wife and embracing fatherhood.
The article also criticizes the Duffys’ podcast topics, which include discussions on traditional family roles and their skepticism of birth control – positions entirely consistent with their Catholic faith. Yet rather than presenting these as legitimate religious and personal convictions, Kitchener portrays them as regressive and harmful. This approach reveals a fundamental disconnect between mainstream media perspectives and the millions of Americans who hold traditional family values as central to their identity and belief system.
“In this all-American household, the roles were clear: Mom whisks and Dad mans the griddle,” Kitchener writes.”,said Caroline Kitchener .
Swift Backlash from Conservatives
The reaction to Kitchener’s article has been swift and decisive from conservative circles. Sean Duffy’s daughter, Evita Duffy-Alfonso, publicly criticized Kitchener’s portrayal of their family, pointing out the clear bias in both the questioning during interviews and the final presentation. Respected commentator John Podhoretz condemned the piece as a “vile caricature” of conservative figures, further highlighting the growing divide between mainstream media outlets and traditional American values.
What’s particularly telling is Kitchener’s background as a former Washington Post correspondent who covered abortion issues, now positioned as a “family journalist” despite demonstrating clear antipathy toward a particular type of family structure. The article ignores numerous studies showing that children raised in traditional two-parent households with clearly defined parental roles often demonstrate better outcomes across multiple metrics, including emotional stability and academic achievement.
“A red-blooded American male who once scored with reality TV stars, he is now a devoted dad with his own chicken coop and beehives, publicly pledging his commitment to his wife and their old Chrysler minivan,” Kitchener wrote.”,said Caroline Kitchener .
Cultural War Against Traditional Families
The targeting of the Duffy family represents a broader cultural war against traditional values in America. By mocking their choice to live according to Catholic principles, their decision to have a large family, and even their planned “Great American Road Trip,” the New York Times article betrays a profound intolerance masquerading as progressive journalism. This approach fundamentally undermines the concept of diversity that such outlets claim to champion, by suggesting there’s only one acceptable way for modern families to structure themselves.
This incident highlights President Trump’s consistent warnings about media bias and the targeted attacks on conservative values in America. The attempt to portray the Duffys’ traditional lifestyle choices as worthy of derision rather than respect demonstrates precisely why millions of Americans have lost faith in mainstream media institutions. True diversity must include respect for those who choose to live according to traditional religious and family values, not just those who conform to progressive ideologies.
